heading

Asia Educational Examination Systems

 



COMPARING ASIA EDUCATIONAL EXAMINATION SYSTEMS:
- Source: UNESCO Report
- Comparison list by Business-in-Asia.com

 CAMBODIA
Educational Examination:
1. National Examination for Lower- Secondary Education Certificate - End of Year 9 (completion of lower secondary and entry to upper secondary)

2. National Examination for Upper-Secondary Education Certificate - End of Year 12 (completion of upper secondary and entry to higher education)

Provided by: Examination Office of the General Secondary Education Department, Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport

CHINA
Educational Examination:
- National Higher Education Entrance Examination - End of Year 12 (entry to higher education)

Provided by: National Education Examinations Authority, Ministry of Education

HONG KONG of China
Educational Examination:
1. Hong Kong Certificate of Education Examinations (HKCEE) - End of Year 11 (completion of Year 11 of upper secondary and entry to Year 12 of upper secondary)

2. Hong Kong Advanced Level Examination (HKALE) - End of Year 13 (completion of upper secondary and entry to higher education)

Provided by: Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority

INDIA
Educational Examination:
1. All India Secondary School Examination (AISSE)- End of Year 10 (completion of Year 10 and entry to Year 11 of upper secondary)
Provided by: Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE)

2. Indian Certificate of Secondary Education (ICSE) - End of Year 10 (completion of Year 10 and entry to Year 11 of upper secondary)
Provided by: Council for Indian School Certificate Examination (CISCE)

3. All India Senior School Certificate Examination (AISSCE) - End of Year 12 (entry to higher education)
Provided by: Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE)

4. Indian School Certificate (ISC - End of Year 12 (entry to higher education)
BY [Private board for Anglo-Indian studies]

INDONESIA
Educational Examination:
1. School Final National Examination (UASBN) - End of Year 6 (completion of primary and entry to lower secondary)

2. National Examination (UN- Ujian Nasional) - End of Year 9 (completion of lower secondary and entry to upper secondary)

3. National Examination (UAN- Ujian Akhir Nasional) - End of Year 12 (completion of upper secondary and entry to higher education)

Provided by: National Education Standards Agency

JAPAN
Educational Examination:
- National Center Test for University Admissions
End of Year 12 (entry to higher education)

Provided by: National Center for University Entrance Examinations

Lao PDR
Educational Examination:
1. Lower Secondary Achievement Examination for Lower Secondary Diploma
End of Year 8 (completion of lower secondary and entry to upper secondary)

2. Upper Secondary Achievement Examination for Upper Secondary Diploma
End of Year 11* (completion of upper secondary and entry to quota places in higher education)

3. National Entrance Examination
End of Year 11* (entry to non quota places in higher education and post-secondary non- tertiary)
* Year 12 will be introduced in year 2010/11.

Provided by: Ministry of Education

MALAYSIA
Educational Examination:
1. Lower Certificate of Education (PMR)
End of Year 9 (selection to certain programmes in upper secondary)
Provided by: Malaysian Examination Syndicate, Ministry of Education

2. Malaysian Certificate of Education (SPM or MCE)
End of Year 11 (completion of Year 11 of upper secondary and entry to post-secondary
Provided by: Malaysian Examination Syndicate, Ministry of Education

3. Malaysian Higher School Certification Examination (STPM)
End of Year 13 (entry to higher education)
Provided by: Malaysian Examinations Council, Ministry of Education

THE PHILIPPINES
Educational Examination:
- National Career Assessment Examination (NCAE)
End of Year 10 (assessment of career choice for higher education)

Provided by: National Educational Testing and Research Center of the Department of Education

Republic of KOREA
Educational Examination:
- College Scholastic Ability Test (CSAT)
End of Year 12 (entry to higher education)

Provided by: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation

SINGAPORE
Educational Examination:
1. Primary School Leaving Examination (PSLE) - End of Year 6 (completion of primary and entry to secondary education)

2. General Certificate of Education ‘N’ and ‘O’ Level Examinations - End of Year 10 (entry to post-secondary)

3. General Certificate of Education ‘A’ Level Examinations - End of Grade 12 (completion of post- secondary and entry to higher education)

Provided by: Singapore Examinations and Assessment Board

THAILAND
Educational Examination:
1. Ordinary National Education Test (O-NET)
End of Years 6, 9 and 12 (national assessment at primary, lower secondary, and upper secondary levels required for all students)

2. General Aptitude Test (GAT) and Professional Aptitude Test (PAT)
End of Year 12 (entry to higher education)

Provided by: National Institute of Educational Testing Service

VIETNAM
Educational Examination:
1. National High School Graduation Exam or Viet Nam Baccalaureate-VB Exam
End of Year 12 (completion of upper secondary)

2. University Entrance Examination (UEE)
*These two exams will be replaced by one exam for completion of upper secondary and entry to higher education
End of Year 12 (entry to higher education)

Provided by: Ministry of Education and Training


Throughout the Asia-Pacific region, examinations are extremely important as they are viewed as the main mechanism for controlling access to the next educational level for students.  Dr Peter Hill, an author of the newly released UNESCO Bangkok publication, "Asia Pacific Secondary Education System Review", said in his publication that the examinations controlled the students' next grade level; access into the most prestigious schools or universities; and, ultimately, decided whether the students would get good jobs or get the best choice of opportunities in life.

Because of this importance, students living in the Asia-Pacific region are more likely to feel pressure and be stressed out before sitting for an examination as so much depends on achieving high scores. At the same time, the education industry was blamed for lack of social and economic responsibility.  The industry responds to the needs by offering too costly private cram coures at high prices that drive poor parents and students into debt.  The parents also go to great lengths to ensure their children have every possible advantage in attaining success in examinations, said the paper.

The UNESCO publication Examination Systems stated that exams have 3 purposes:

1. It is a selection function and entails controlling access to secondary schools, courses within schools and entry to higher education institutions.

2. It is a certifying function and entails finding out and reporting what a student has achieved, whether they have graduated, and what they know and are able to do.

3. The systems often make use of examination results for accountability purposes and, in particular, for evaluating the effectiveness of instruction, for motivating students and teachers to perform well, and for reviewing the effectiveness of school

After reviewing the UNESCO report, we see that the challenges in Asia's Education Examination Systems are:

- System encourages cheating and corruption: Current examination systems throughout the region are so important to students and parents; therefore are vulnerable to a number of problems including cheating, corruption, and excessive drilling and commercial tutoring.

- Despite the economic downturn, parents continue to spend much money trying to place their children into good educational institutes.

- The current systems put increased pressure on students to succeed. It also caused peer-pressure influence.  For example,
according to the paper, the increasing popularity of ‘‘cram schools’’ in India that prepare students to score higher in university entrance exams has increase pressure on students.

- Cause a change in social behaviors: For example, data showed that during the entrance examination in Korea, the workday began an hour late so that students could avoid the morning rush hour. Parents are packed at temples in Seoul to pray for the success of their children on their exams.

- One examination affected the other. For example, in Indonesia, students sit a standardized examination at the end of the primary, junior high and senior high school levels that determines admission to the next level of schooling. If the students could not pass the first exam level, they would not be able to enroll for the next level of education. This means that the student had to take another year in the same grade, plus it would cause a disgrace for the students and their families.

- The competition for national examination is high, but resource for rural areas is low.  For example, in China, the most significant examination is the gaokao taken by Grade 12 students who want to enter university. Zhou Wenhui, a Grade 12 high school student in semi-rural Hunan province, said she is aware that it will be harder for her to score a classroom grade that is higher than her urban counterparts’ achievements due to less equitable access to quality learning. However, she believes the exam is an equalizer. ‘‘The exam lets poor kids have the chance to change their life,’’ she said as reported in the paper.

- The society puts too much value on exam scores.  For example,  in Thailand, Professor Utumporn Jamornmann, director of the National Institute of Educational Testing Service (NIETS) of Thailand, commented that Thai students and parents did not have a lot of confidence in the public school system so they opt for tutoring to assist their children to achieve a higher score in exams. But to improve students’ performances, society must invest in and develop the learning and teaching that take place in the classroom,’’ she says.

The UNESCO report reviews the current practices and other salient features of examinations in different countries. It focuses particularly on public (standardized) examinations and makes suggestions on what can be done to improve examination systems.

In summary, the report suggested improvement strategies as follow:

1 Assuring integrity of assessments
2 Reducing examination pressures
3 Catering for an expanding and more diverse student candidature
4 Assessing a wider range of curricular objectives
5 Assuring quality and gaining public confidence

Full report can be downloaded at UNESCO website, or click here for the link.





Other related articles on our website:





Follow us on Twitter:







 
Google

www www.Business-in-asia.com
Runckel & Associates LogoContact us


 


Visit our other website: Asia-Art.net
www.Business-in-Asia.com